References

Artner, R., Verliefde, T., Steegen, S., Gomes, S., Traets, F., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vanpaemel, W. (2021). The reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research: An investigation using unpublished raw data. Psychological Methods, 26(5), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000365

Bishop, L. (2006). A Proposal for Archiving Context for Secondary Analysis. Methodological Innovation Online, 1(2), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2006.0008

Blask, K., Latz, M., Müller, M.-L., & Gellert, S. (2022). D-Psy-FAIR: Four simple steps to sustainable data documentation in psychology. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.12180

Burgard, T., Bosnjak, M., & Studtrucker, R. (2022). PsychOpen CAMA: Publication of community-augmented meta-analyses in psychology. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1536

Clyburne-Sherin, A., Fei, X., & Green, S. A. (2019). Computational Reproducibility via Containers in Psychology. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.892

CoARA. (2022). Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment.

Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K., & McGillivray, B. (2020). The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0230416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416

DFG. (2015). DFG Guidelines on the Handling of Research Data.

DFG. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.

DGfE, GEBF, & GFD. (2020). Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (DGfE), der Gesellschaft für Empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF) und der Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GFD) zur Archivierung, Bereitstellung und Nachnutzung von Forschungsdaten in den Erziehungs- und Bildungswissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken.

DGPs. (2021). Management und Bereitstellung von Forschungsdaten in der Psychologie: Überarbeitung der DGPs-Empfehlungen: DGPs-Kommission ,,Open Science“ (beschlossen durch den Vorstand der DGPs am 26. 06. 2020). Psychologische Rundschau, 72(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000514

DGS. (2019). Stellungnahme: Bereitstellung und Nachnutzung von Forschungsdaten in der Soziologie.

ERC. (2022). Open Research Data and Data Management Plans. Information for ERC grantees.

Errington, T. M., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021). Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. eLife, 10, e67995. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67995

European Commission. (2018). OSPP-REC: Open Science Policy Platform Recommendations. Publications Office.

European Commission. (2023). Horizon Europe (HORIZON). HE Programme Guide. Version 4.0. Publications Office.

Gabelica, M., Bojčić, R., & Puljak, L. (2022). Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 150, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.019

Gärtner, A., Leising, D., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2022). Responsible Research Assessment II: A specific proposal for hiring and promotion in psychology. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5yexm

Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C. J., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A., Schönbrodt, F., & Steinberg, U. (2021). Management und Bereitstellung von Forschungsdaten in der Psychologie: Überarbeitung der DGPs-Empfehlungen: DGPs-Kommission ,,Open Science“ (beschlossen durch den Vorstand der DGPs am 26. 06. 2020). Psychologische Rundschau, 72(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000514

Goodey, G., Hahnel, M., Zhou, Y., Jiang, L., Chandramouliswaran, I., Hafez, A., Paine, T., Gregurick, S., Simango, S., Peña, J. M. P., Murray, H., Cannon, M., Grant, R., McKellar, K., & Day, L. (2022). The State of Open Data 2022. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21276984.v5

Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (Eds.). (2018). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.

Kraft, A. (2023). The FAIR Data Principles. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.13577

Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of Scooping Case Study on Researcher Strategies against Fear of Scooping in the Context of Open Science. Data Science Journal, 16, 29. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029

Logan, J. A. R., Hart, S. A., & Schatschneider, C. (2021). Data Sharing in Education Science. AERA Open, 7, 233285842110064. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211006475

Mauthner, N. S., Parry, O., & Backett-Milburn, K. (1998). The Data are Out there, or are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data. Sociology, 32(4), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032004006

Meyermann, A., & Porzelt, M. (2019). Datenschutzrechtliche Anforderungen in der empirischen Bildungsforschung. Eine Handreichung. Version 2.1. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:21990

Mozersky, J., McIntosh, T., Walsh, H. A., Parsons, M. V., Goodman, M., & DuBois, J. M. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0261719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261719

Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of Open Data and Computational Reproducibility in Registered Reports in Psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918872

Open Knowledge Foundation. (2023). What is Open Data? In Open Data Handbook. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/.

Piwowar, H. A., & Vision, T. J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1, e175. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175

Prosser, A. M. B., Hamshaw, R. J. T., Meyer, J., Bagnall, R., Blackwood, L., Huysamen, M., Jordan, A., Vasileiou, K., & Walter, Z. (2022). When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 12576. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576

RfII. (2019). Herausforderung Datenqualität Empfehlungen zur Zukunftsfähigkeit von Forschung im digitalen Wandel.

Schneider, J., Rosman, T., Kelava, A., & Merk, S. (2022). Do Open-Science Badges Increase Trust in Scientists Among Undergraduates, Scientists, and the Public? Psychological Science, 33(9), 1588–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221097499

Schönbrodt, F., Gärtner, A., Frank, M., Gollwitzer, M., Ihle, M., Mischkowski, D., Phan, L. V., Schmitt, M., Scheel, A. M., Schubert, A.-L., Steinberg, U., & Leising, D. (2022). Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.8162

Steinhardt, I., Fischer, C., Heimstädt, M., Hirsbrunner, S. D., İkiz-Akıncı, D., Kressin, L., Kretzer, S., Möllenkamp, A., Porzelt, M., Rahal, R.-M., Schimmler, S., Wilke, R., & Wünsche, H. (2021). Opening up and Sharing Data from Qualitative Research: A Primer: Results of a workshop run by the research group ,,Digitalization and Science“ at the Weizenbaum Institute in Berlin on January 17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WS/17

Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e26828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026828

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18